Tunisia: With whom Nadia Akasha opened secret lines?
Sky world news / With whom Nadia Akasha opened secret lines?
Those who know the way the presidential security works in Tunisia affirm and even assert the impossibility of passing a message of the kind described in the telegram of the Tunis Africa News Agency and also through the statement published by the Presidency of the Republic, without knowing the content and taking the necessary measures, which means.
If we believe there is a message In essence, "some party" undertook the delivery of the suspicious envelope to Nadia Akasha without going through the monitoring system that supervises the Presidential Security. In all countries of the world, and at all ages, politicians open secret lines with many parties, meaning that this relationship does not pass the usual diplomatic paths, from ministries and embassies, whether at the level of receiving or receiving messages.
The only explanation for the existence of a "bombed" letterIn the hands of the president's advisor, Nadia Akasha, lies in the fact that she opened a secret line with someone.
Secrecy that requires bypassing the control and protection agencies that exist within the presidency. What confirms this possibility lies in the announcement by the Presidency Foundation, through the telegram of the Tunis Africa News Agency, or the statement it issued, that the envelope did not contain any message, which is likely to suggest that Nadia Akasha did not want to publish this message or acquaint any party with it.
Returning to the news that was spread and confirmed by the cable of the Tunisian Africa News Agency, we find “an attSky world news / With whom Nadia Akasha opened secret lines? Those who know the way the presidential security works in Tunisia affirm and even assert the impossibility of passing a message of the kind described in the telegram of the Tunis Africa News Agency and also through the statement published by the Presidency of the Republic, without knowing the content and taking the necessary measures, which means.
If we believe there is a message In essence, "some party" undertook the delivery of the suspicious envelope to Nadia Akasha without going through the monitoring system that supervises the Presidential Security. In all countries of the world, and at all ages, politicians open secret lines with many parties, meaning that this relationship does not pass the usual diplomatic paths, froempt to poison the president of the republic,” which means that the message that “eluded” the presidential security was addressed to President Qais Saeed personally, so the question is: Did Chancellor Nadia Akasha open the message on its own Herself and transgressing her duties.
Or is she personally qualified by the president of the republic to assume this "undeclared" mission? In both cases, we understand the presidential announcement that "the president of the republic" is the intended target of this poisoning attempt .
Many questions remain pending, including what concerns the party that sent the envelope, and the party that delivered it and placed it in the hands of Nadia Akasha? Also, did this party intentionally "poison" the message, and why? Or did “another party”? entered the line and were able to either replace the original envelope with another “poisoned” or did it open and poison it, without the knowledge of the “postman” or his knowledge? It is certain that all these possibilities are based on the impossibility of a "toxic" circumstance passing in the hands of the presidential security personnel without knowing what is in it, and then taking the applicable measures stipulated in the protocol for dealing with theseAlso, it is impossible or difficult for the “story” to be made up from its basis, despite the loopholes that must be pointed out, when we learn that Nadia Akasha thanked the military medicine frames, and therefore it is impossible or very difficult to believe that this public thanksgiving is not supported by facts and facts on the ground.
Gaps or concealment of evidence? In all cases and in all possibilities, and whatever the truth, whether it was fabricated from its foundations and consequently there is no existence of the circumstance or the message, or (unlike) Nadia Akasha reached a "poisoned" circumstance how did it come?, Without a message inside it is this truth ?, Many dangerous and confusing questions remain pending and need urgent and serious answers at the same time.
